Kim Newman on Horror

Your whole fascination with horror started with Dracula, but it was the film that got you into the book.

Yes, that’s true. I saw the Bela Lugosi movie before I read the book. I was about 11 years old and I managed to persuade my parents to let me stay up late at night to watch it. I did actually read the book very soon after that. In those days if you saw something and you liked it you couldn’t go out and get the DVD – the book was often the only sort of extra merchandise that was about.

So what was it about Dracula that grabbed you?

Of all the books I’ve listed here it’s actually the worst! It’s full of things that don’t work or are overdone. But, even though it’s an 1890s novel, there’s still a real narrative drive, even when it hares all over the place and changes points of view. I love all that stuff with the train timetables and the newspapers and the diary extracts which go out of their way to convince you that the whole book might be true. It’s one of those things where the whole cultural impact is greater than the book itself. Actually, I don’t think it’s as good as Carmilla. But it is still undoubtedly the great vampire novel. There wouldn’t be a whole rack of vampire books in bookshops if it wasn’t for Dracula. Other stories in this genre tend to be slightly more refined, more ironic. But the thing about Dracula is that it’s a good old-fashioned blood and guts melodrama designed to be frightening. It’s also got all these other kinds of levels and meanings. And I think one of the things that people like about it is that it can mean so many different things. There’s a political reading and a Freudian reading and all other kinds of interpretations of what is going on in this big sprawling book. Unlike a lot of the classics I still enjoy re-reading Dracula.

And you have actually written various spin-offs, haven’t you?

That’s right. Amongst others I have a book called Anno Dracula. It is literally a vampire book because it takes from other books and bleeds them dry! It’s as much a critique as a sequel. Dracula has been a big part of my creative life. I keep going back to it.

Your next book, despite being so short, is described as one of the most influential vampire novels around.

I Am Legend is a book from the 1950s which is probably well known now because it was made into a film last year. It’s been made into a film three times and none of the films have actually got why this book works. With the last film you knew it was going to be rubbish as soon as the writer and the director said: “Oh there are not going to be any vampires.” The whole point of the book is that it’s about vampires! If you take them out it’s like saying, “We’re making Gone with the Wind, but we’re not setting it in the South after the Civil War!

It’s not quite the first but it is the most important vampire book which is a science-fiction novel. These are supernatural creatures and they are beings of a different order who are suffering from a kind of blood disease which has strange side-effects. They are allergic to light and they need blood to feed. You need wood to destroy them because that allows air to get into the wound. It’s all reasonably well thought through with this notion that the whole world could suddenly turn upside-down. As the title suggests, the human is the monster in this world. If everybody is the vampire then a last lone normal person would be terrifying. It’s also the story of a serial killer. The character is a vampire slayer who goes through the book killing vampires. It’s a short and perfectly formed book. Richard Matheson wrote a bunch of other things I really like. He is a real model of streamlined 1950s efficiency. He writes the way Americans used to make cars – every little piece is perfect. It’s a book you can read in about two hours and there is nothing you would change about it.

He very much inspired a wave of writers like your next choice, Stephen King.

Absolutely. It’s no coincidence that his books are the ones that are being turned into films. Every couple of years someone makes a film of one of his novels and he is still alive and still writing.

And this is very much a theme with the books you have chosen – many of them have been made into films.

I suppose so. But then again in this particular field the good stuff is recycled endlessly. It may well be that there aren’t that many stories that you can do as movies. All these work. And most of them have actually been made into films several times. I think Dracula and Jekyll and Hyde may even hold some kind of record for the number of times they have been made into films.

Tell me about Misery by Stephen King.