FiveBooks Interviews > 

Robert Service on Totalitarian Russia

Professor of Russian Studies at Oxford, forced to choose between Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, says Stalin was definitely the worst of the lot

Your first choice is George Orwell’s 1984.

I read this, like most people do, when I was in my mid-teens. At that stage I was a classicist and I had no thought of doing anything about Russian history. I think, looking back, this was the book which influenced me more than any other when I came to take up historical study, because of its astonishing insight into totalitarian regimes.
And I think that one of the great things about Orwell’s account of totalitarianism is not just the tremendous power that 20th-century dictatorships have exercised, but also how sordid and squalid the living conditions are for many of the people there. And I’m impressed by how individuals, with any independence of mind, still managed to survive those conditions. In other words, the book looks at how order and disorder co-habit. And I think Orwell, without ever having gone to the USSR, really did understand it from the outside brilliantly.
 
How do you think he managed that?
 
I think he did that probably from a lot of his personal experiences, particularly in Spain where he saw how the Spanish Communist Party acted on the orders of the International Communist Party. At the time they were going about exterminating their Communist and Socialist enemies. And he applied this knowledge to what he understood about Soviet foreign, and indeed internal, policy. 
 
And have you seen any examples of what he wrote about in your own research?
 
When I read depictions of what a perfect Communist order would look like, written by Communists, all of the nasty underbelly of Communism is kept back. But, over the 1960s and 1970s, more and more accounts came out of the USSR concerning this picture that Orwell drew. People lived cheek by jowl with each other, and there was this extraordinary central power along with sordid demoralising social conditions. Most notably, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book The Gulag Archipelago went in the same direction. This almost became the main theme of Soviet literature.

Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War is a nod to the classicist in you.

 
Thucydides wrote the classic account of the war between Athens and Sparta in the 5th century BC. It was a war that took place over many years and it brought Athens to its knees.  It was the trauma of Thucydides’ lifetime and in the book he sought to explain why the war had gone on so long and why Athens lost it.
 
Reading Thucydides was just a magical experience because of the way he attends to causation. I love the attention he gives to supplying the reader with all manner of possible explanations before going for the one that he prefers. He has an almost surgical precision in the way he weighs up one factor against another. He is one of the most original historians. 
 
So do you enjoy the way he is almost showing the reader how he is working through the different theories before going for one in particular?
 
That is what really attracts me. I think that if a historian produces an account, but locks the reader into only one way of looking at something, he’s giving the reader short measure and he is condescending to the reader. Thucydides never does this. He always gives his reader enough opportunity to form a different judgment from the one that he would like to insist upon himself. It is that sort of openness to discussion and debate that I found very attractive and influential. That stayed with me, when I moved from doing the Greek classics, to doing Russian literature, and then eventually to doing Soviet politics and ultimately history.
 
So that’s something you have tried to emulate in your work?
 
I think that while I have a very strong set of guidelines for understanding the 20th-century Communist experience I hope that I don’t canalise everything into a single exclusive explanation.

You’ve gone for another classic for your third choice, Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment.

 
Oh, this is the antidote to ways of looking at history that insist only on external and objective workings of political and economic and social circumstances. A long time before Freud, Dostoevsky was at work explaining the contradictory, clashing tendencies of the human spirit through his anti-hero, the murderer Raskolnikov. I read this in my second year at college when I was still doing Russian literature and my very enlightened tutor said that I could just stop doing the rest of the 19th-century curriculum and concentrate on Dostoevsky for a year. I have never regretted it. I think Dostoevsky understood psychological and social contradictions in life to a peak of intensity later writers have seldom been able to match.

 

 
Tell me about your next author, Alexander Blok, and his poem The Twelve.
 
Alexander Blok was a poet living in the early 20th-century, a symbolist poet who wrote the most opaque verses imaginable about the music of the times. It was all deeply uncongenial to me. But, when the 1917 Revolution happened, he managed to attune himself to the chaos and the disorder. He wrote about the achievements and disasters of revolutionary Russia.

Comments

Good choices? What's missing? Write your thoughts below

About Robert Service

Robert Service is Professor of Russian Studies at St Antony’s College, Oxford. His research interests cover Russian history from the late 19th century to the present day and he has written numerous books on the subject. Nowadays he is focusing on Russia in its international framework. He is currently working on the geopolitics of the Russian Revolution as well as a study of the end of the Cold War.

Robert Service on Wikipedia
Robert Service at Oxford

Robert Service’s Recommendations

Crime and Punishment

by Fyodor Dostoevsky

Buy

“This is the antidote to ways of looking at history that insist only on external and objective workings of political and economic and social circumstances. A long time before Freud, Dostoevsky was at work explaining the contradictory, clashing tendencies of the human spirit through his anti-hero, the murderer Raskolnikov. I think Dostoevsky understood psychological and social...”

The Twelve

by Alexander Blok

Buy

“ Alexander Blok was a poet living in the early 20th century. He wrote about the achievements and disasters of revolutionary Russia. He centred on a rabble that was roaming through the streets of Petrograd at the end of 1917. And he used this very refined language that he had developed many years earlier and combined that with snatches of folksong and street jargon that make...”

My Life

by Leon Trotsky

Buy

“Trotsky is a wonderful writer. I think he is one of the two great political writers of the 20th century, the other being Winston Churchill. But, as you move through the book, you get a very strong sense of a man who is justifying his own politics and his own career choices. He gets less and less attractive and less and less plausible as the first half of the book gives way to...”

History of the Peloponnesian War

by Thucydides

Buy

“ Gideon Rose says: It’s a brilliant, kaleidoscopic, panoramic view of states in action in the international sphere. And every age that reads it finds great insight into their own era   Joseph Nye says: He says the basic cause of the Peloponnesian War was the rise in the power of Athens and the fear that created in Sparta   Robert Service says: Reading Thucydides was...”

1984

by George Orwell

Buy

“This alerts us to the danger of unfettered state power, which always ends up committing violations against individuals, particularly torture”
1 of 1

Books by Robert Service

Lenin

by Robert Service

Buy

Trotsky

by Robert Service

Buy

1 of 1

Related Articles

  • Ukraine's Past On Trial

    Timothy Snyder | NYRB

    Kiev court posthumously convicts Stalin of genocide in Ukraine. But this was a show trial. More effective if European countries co-operated to publicise Soviet crimes

  • Russia’s Reckoning with Katyń

    Timothy Snyder | NYR Blog

    President Lech Kaczynski killed in a plane crash by mariobonsai Russia deserves praise for acknowledging Katyń as Soviet crime, mass-murder of Polish elite. But note, Russia is offering the admission as a foreign policy gambit. Wants Poland, now it's in the EU, as an ally

  • How we got the Soviets wrong

    Peregrine Worsthorne | Prospect

    Andy Warhol by dorena-wm

    Former cold warrior looks back and wonders how his generation over-estimated the threat of communism as an ideology. One upshot: it 'saddled the US with a neocon political class' as narrow-minded as the Soviets

  • Party Politics

    Robert Service | New Statesman

    Christiania Russia 1917 by willierap

    Leading authority on Soviet Communism summarises some key arguments of his latest history book. 'What happened in the October 1917 revolution in Russia was an ideological bank robbery'. A good read

  • Hammer & tickle

    Ben Lewis | Prospect

    The Hammer & Sickle by icantcu

    Groan-worthy title, but a fascinating article. How Soviet jokes were both a form of resistance, and a pressure-valve invaluable to the communist regime. And some of the jokes aren't half bad