America’s master griller chooses books on the world’s oldest cooking method. He discusses why brown tastes better, and how our primal urge to play with fire helped us evolve
Several of your choices were cited as resources for The Barbecue Bible, your book which you spent four years on and travelled 200,000 miles to research. You’ve written eight books and done three television series about barbecue. What got you started on this decades-long odyssey?
It started with the realisation that grilling is the world’s oldest and most widespread cooking method, yet everywhere it’s done, it’s done differently – it’s simultaneously universal and highly local. Grilling is part of human DNA and part of our cultural heritage. If you look at human evolution, it’s something that lies at the core of our humanity. But, at the same time, every culture and every grill master does it in a unique way. This idea propelled me on my journey to observe and document open-fire cooking in different countries and cultures. And it became the lens through which I viewed the world.
What’s the most interesting thing you learned on this journey?
On one level I learned traditional and iconic dishes and techniques that have filled eight books. On another level I learned about the role grilling plays in particular cultures. We think of grilling as a guy thing in the West, but in Asia women usually do it. We think of barbecuing as backyard activity in North America, but in other parts of the world it’s done on the streets and in the finest restaurants. It’s difficult to sum up what I’ve learned, but if pressed I’d paraphrase Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin’s treatise The Physiology of Taste: Tell me what you grill and I’ll tell you who you are.
I want to clear up one question covered in your backyard basics book, How to Grill. What’s the difference between barbecue and grilling?
Grilling is cooking food directly over a hot fire. It has three characteristics: hot fire, quick cooking time, and cuts of meat or food that are intrinsically tender and generally small. So you grill a steak. True barbecue is an indirect method: food is cooked near but not directly on the fire. Barbecue entails much lower temperature, much longer cooking time, and much bigger pieces of meat plus the presence of smoke and smoke flavour.
Let’s begin with a book by a British primatologist. Catching Fire isn’t a cookbook, it’s a new take on evolutionary history. Richard Wrangham argues that learning to cook food over fire made us human. Please explain.
People have deep emotions about grilling. The act of lighting a fire and creating a barbecue seems to bring a sense of comfort, satisfaction and community that you just don’t get with other cooking methods. Why? There is the pleasure of sitting around a fire, the incredible aromas and flavours you get with cooking over fire and then there’s the long human history of open-fire cooking.
About 1.8 million years ago homo erectus roasted an auroch, a prehistoric cow. A human ancestor tasted it and uttered the first grunt of gastronomic satisfaction. When you eat meat cooked, instead of raw, there’s several physiological, social and emotional things that happen. Prior to homo erectus and the application of fire to cooking, our ancestors were eating machines. Their skulls were characterised by giant teeth, giant jaws and very small crania because they spent all their time chewing raw food. After the discovery of cooking with fire, teeth get smaller and brains triple in size. Our ancestors develop a smaller jaw and a more agile tongue so we have the ability to speak. And because cooked food is much more easily metabolised, our ancestors were able to develop larger brains. With this new-found intelligence we evolved to become speaking and thinking animals, which is our evolutionary edge over all the other animals in the world.
Additionally, our ancestors developed different kinds of social behaviours. When you cook meat over fire you have a common focal point for a group and we become more social animals. While other primates eat on their own, so they keep their food to themselves, we sit around and share a fire and our food, and cooking becomes a communal activity. Simultaneously, for the first time, you get a division of labour. Female and male gorillas gather and eat food in pretty much the same way. Because human beings had a fire that had to be tended, we get a division of labour. One part of the community stays home to nourish the fire and do hearth-oriented work, while another part of the community goes out to hunt. One brings home the food while the other takes care of the household. So the human face, human intelligence, speech, social organisation and even division of labour – all of these potentially began with the act of cooking meat over fire. You could say that barbecue began human civilisation.
Wrangham argues that spending less time feeding freed up our time for more complex endeavours. But nowadays, many humans seem to devote as much energy to what they eat as any of our fellow mammals. What do you make of the modern focus on food?
Wrangham points out that primates in the wild spend about six hours a day chewing, while fire-using human beings do their chewing and eating in a half-an-hour to an hour a day. Our greater leisure time and better-developed brains gave rise to art. The fact that we shape our environment in creative and meaningful ways helps distinguish us from every other animal. The first art actually did have a fire and barbecue connection. The first carved animal bones are as many as 100,000 years old and the first cave art, portraying hunting scenes and using charcoal, a derivative of fire, was done at least 40,000 years ago. Now fast forward to the modern day, we have evolved art in many different ways. We have musical arts, visual arts, digital arts and we’ve turned cooking into an art.
The evolution of cooking into an art has been ongoing for thousands of years. Early humans began seasoning their food in a way that other animals don’t (man is the only animal who cooks). Ancient Greek and Romans had celebrity chefs and celebrity cookbooks. The way today’s human beings spend so much time preparing food, thinking about food, writing about food and relishing food, clearly has less to do with satisfying our nutritional needs than it does with our passion for art.
Steven Raichlen studied medieval cooking in Europe as a Watson Fellow and trained at Le Cordon Bleu in Paris. A former restaurant critic, he writes for a wide range of publications, from The New York Times to Playboy. Of the 29 books he has authored, eight are focused on grilling and barbecue. His next book will be a novel set on Martha’s Vineyard. He has also hosted three television series on grilling (one in French) and won five James Beard Awards for his books. On Japanese TV, he defeated the Iron Chef in the “Barbecue Battle of the Gods”